Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Trishul Reality Infra LLP (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Trishul Reality Infra LLP (ITAT Mumbai) Addition u/s 68 on Alleged Accommodation Loan Deleted – Assessee Not Required to Prove Source of Source for Unsecured Loan – ITAT Mumbai The Revenue challenged deletion of addition of ₹40 lakh u/s 68 alleging that the assessee LLP was ultimate beneficiary of accommodation entries routed through a shell company, M/s Mahagouri Vintrade Pvt. Ltd., via lender M/s Gulmohar Towers Pvt. Ltd. The AO treated the loan as unexplained on the basis of Investigation Wing findings that the upstream company was a paper entity. ITAT noted that the assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031