Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kuppusamy Thankaraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kuppusamy Thankaraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai Deletes ₹77.95 Lakh Disallowance Under Section 40A(3): No Proof of Split Cash Payments The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19 and deleted the disallowance of ₹77.94 lakh made under section 40A(3) in respect of cash payments for purchase of firewood. The Assessing Officer had alleged that the assessee deliberately split lump-sum cash payments into amounts not exceeding ₹10,000 per day per person to circumvent section 40A(3) read with Rule 6DD, and accordingly treate...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930