Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sachin Mahasukhlal Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sachin Mahasukhlal Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Survive When Quantum Itself Is Remanded—Penalty Proceedings Restored to AO for Fresh Decision  Both appeals relate to penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) arising from the same quantum addition in AY 2015-16. In each case, the assessee had claimed deduction of ₹38,15,160 as interest expenditure, which the AO disallowed for lack of nexus with plot-rent income. The AO thereafter levied penalty of ₹32,02,179 in the case of Sachin Mahasukhlal Shah and ₹13,13,232 in the case of Rupa Sachin Shah. Before the Tribunal, it ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031