This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Search-Based Penalties Collapsed: Additions Were Only Disallowances, Not Undisclosed Income
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Trig Detectives Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Trig Detectives Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Search u/s 132 was conducted on 18.07.2019 & assessments were framed u/s 153A with multiple disallowances of salary & wages, administrative expenses, 40(a)(ia), excess depreciation & interest. Assessee accepted quantum but contested penalties. Penalties u/s 271(1)(c) (AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17), 270A (AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20) & 271AAB (AY 2020-21) were upheld partly by CIT(A).
Before Tribunal, Assessee argued all additions were mere disallowances with no seized material linking them to search, hence Explanation 5A to 271(1)(c), ...






