Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krishnaping Alloys Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Krishnaping Alloys Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Rectification for Return-Filing Mistake Revived; Mere Dispatch Entry Not Proof of 143(1) Service The assessee’s return for AY 2006-07 correctly showed profit before tax of about ₹22 lakh, but due to an accountant’s error the gross sales figure of about ₹5.05 crore was mistakenly entered in the “income from business” column in the computation, inflating the total income to about ₹5.08 crore. The return was processed under section 143(1) on the basis of this erroneous figure, creating a huge demand of about ₹2 crore. The assessee clai...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031