This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reassessment u/s 148 Quashed Where No Addition Made on Recorded Reasons: ITAT Cuttack
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Arpita Jena Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-2017
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Cuttack
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Arpita Jena Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack)
Reassessment u/s 148 Quashed Where No Addition Made on Recorded Reasons; Entire Proceedings Held Invalid – ITAT Cuttack
The ITAT Cuttack allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17 & quashed the reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148, holding that the reassessment cannot survive when no addition is ultimately made on the very reasons recorded for reopening.
In this case, the AO issued notice u/s 148 solely on the ground that the assessee had sold an immovable property for ₹75 lakh & had not filed return of income. However, during ...






