ITAT Cuttack held that AO wrongly allowed the set off of brought forward loss and accordingly order of AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act rightly invoked.
As per AO, Shri Birat Chandra Dagara was one of the partner of the assessee firm and had owned the mining lease and submitted the details as per which the assessee was found indulged in the illegal production of iron ore.
ITAT Cuttack held that difference between the sales declared in the profit and loss account and as per the cash book entire added by PCIT without providing sufficient opportunity to reconcile the same. Thus, AO directed to examine the issue.
ITAT Cuttack remands Sitaram Fruits Co. case to AO for fresh review due to non-receipt of notices and disputed cash payments. Appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Cuttack allows restoration of Harichandanpur LAMPS appeal due to non-compliance issues, directing CIT(A) to reconsider with an opportunity to the assessee.
ITAT restores case to CIT(A) as incorrect filing date led to faulty judgment in Emerald Mining Pvt. Ltd. tax dispute.
ITAT Cuttack rules replacement of gear boxes in Surface Furnace Kiln as current repairs under Section 31(1) for Sponge Tata Iron Ltd. Read the full judgment analysis.
Cuttack ITAT condones a 145-day delay in the Tirupati Prasad Sahu vs. ITO case due to emails going to spam. Case restored for merits adjudication.
ITAT Cuttack – Abani Pattanayak Vs ACIT- ITAT ruled that maintenance and electricity charges not in the form of deposits are excluded from property cost for computing LTCG
ITAT Cuttack held that claim of exemption of long term capital gains (LTCG), from sale of equity shares, under section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 allowable as requisite conditions satisfied.
