Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Khajamohiaddin Ghousemohiaddin Syed Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Khajamohiaddin Ghousemohiaddin Syed Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Second Bite at the Same Cherry Not Allowed— Reopening on Same Issue is Pure Change of Opinion Reassessment Quashed

Assessee engaged in civil construction filed revised return declaring income of Rs.40,01,190/-. Original assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144 dated 28/03/2016 determined income at Rs.1,33,63,668/- by applying presumptive rate of 8% u/s 44AD on gross receipts of Rs.16,70,45,850/-, after rejecting the books due to absence of supporting evidenc

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031