Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd Shafi Isamail Merchant Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohd Shafi Isamail Merchant Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Quashed for Non-Recording of Reasons u/s 148(2): ITAT Mumbai Draws Adverse Inference Against Revenue The Mumbai ITAT (SMC Bench) allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2006-07 and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148, holding that the mandatory requirement of recording reasons for reopening was not complied with. The reassessment was triggered solely on the basis of AIR information alleging investment of ₹43.62 lakh in immovable property. The assessment was completed ex parte under section 144 r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031