Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Annakodiraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Annakodiraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) In this case, the ITAT Chennai held that a reassessment cannot survive when no addition is ultimately made on the very reasons recorded for reopening. The AO had reopened the assessment based on alleged cash deposits (₹1.15 lakh) and withdrawals (₹1.70 crore). However, in the final reassessment order, no addition was made on these issues. Instead, the AO made completely unrelated additions—estimating net profit and treating milk sales as unexplained purchases. The Tribunal noted that these additions had no nexus with the reasons recorded for reopening. R...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031