Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adarsh Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Adarsh Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening Beyond 3 Years Invalid – Approval by PCIT Instead of PCCIT Violates Sec 151(ii) – Entire Reassessment Quashed – ITAT Mumbai AO reopened assessment u/s 147 alleging undervaluation of property u/s 43CA & estimated GP addition; CIT(A) upheld reassessment and additions. Assessee raised additional legal grounds challenging validity of notice u/s 148 under new regime. ITAT held that where notice is issued beyond 3 years, approval must be obtained from specified higher authority as per Sec 151(ii). In present case, sanction was granted by PCI...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031