Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hariram Jagaji Chaudhari Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hariram Jagaji Chaudhari Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The present appeals concern multiple assessment years arising from a common order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), involving additions made on account of alleged unaccounted cash payments (“on-money”) in relation to purchase of a shop in a commercial project. The background of the case lies in a search and seizure operation conducted under Section 132 in the case of a real estate developer group and its key personnel. During the search, digital material in the form of an Excel sheet was found from a key employee responsible for handling s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Mumbai: No Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) on Estimated Bogus Purchase Additions ITAT Mumbai: Sec 54 Claim Cannot Be Denied Merely for No Original Return-Allowed in Reassessment SC: Partnership Cannot Be Used to Mask Illegal Sub-Lease; Courts Will Lift the Veil ITAT Mumbai: On-Money Addition Based on Third-Party Evidence Excel Sheets Deleted Third-Party Excel Sheets & Statements Without Corroboration Have No Evidentiary Value View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930