Case Law Details
Case Name : Ganesharam Galbaram Mali Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganesharam Galbaram Mali Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
On-Money Addition Deleted – Third Party Excel Statement Not Sufficient Without Corroboration
AO made addition u/s 69 (₹4 lakh) alleging cash “on-money” payment for purchase of shop based on:
Excel sheet seized from third party (Rubberwala Group)
Statement of employee (Imran Ansari) & developer
CIT(A) upheld addition.
ITAT held:
No direct evidence linking assessee to cash payment (no receipt, diary, confirmation, etc.)
Addition based only on third-party material & statement
Assessee was denied cross-examination → violation of n...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
