Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chirag Kirpal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chirag Kirpal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Faceless Mandate Prevails – JAO Has No Power to Issue Notice u/s 148 Post Faceless Regime- Notice by Jurisdictional AO Invalid Under s.151A: ITAT Delhi Assessee, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), had purchased immovable property worth ₹65 lakh in AY 2016-17 but did not file return. Based on flagged information under CBDT’s risk management strategy, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 29.03.2023. In response, Assessee filed return declaring income of only ₹2,482/-. AO disbelieved Assessee’s claim that the investment was funded by a gift from his father &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031