This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Jurisdictional AO Cannot Issue Notice u/s 148 After Faceless Mandate: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Chirag Kirpal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Chirag Kirpal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Faceless Mandate Prevails – JAO Has No Power to Issue Notice u/s 148 Post Faceless Regime- Notice by Jurisdictional AO Invalid Under s.151A: ITAT Delhi
Assessee, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI), had purchased immovable property worth ₹65 lakh in AY 2016-17 but did not file return. Based on flagged information under CBDT’s risk management strategy, AO issued notice u/s 148 on 29.03.2023. In response, Assessee filed return declaring income of only ₹2,482/-. AO disbelieved Assessee’s claim that the investment was funded by a gift from...



