Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Bharat Promoters (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CIT Vs Bharat Promoters (Madras High Court) ITAT is the final fact-finding authority & unless its findings are shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence, interference by the High Court under Section 260A is unwarranted: Madras High Court Assessee furnished the return of its income   declaring a taxable income   which included a declared short term capital gain & income from other sources. AO  passed 143(3) order making certain additions. On appeal,  before the  CIT(A)  submitted that  they had incurred the expenses of Rs.6,97,78,544/- for the development of land in t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930