Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bipin Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Bipin Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)  Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹5.50 Lakh Addition u/s 69A: No Cash Found, Third-Party Seized Ledger Not Enough The Delhi Bench ‘B’ of the ITAT allowed the appeal of  holding that addition of ₹5,50,000 u/s 69A cannot be sustained merely on the basis of third-party seized documents when no cash was found in the possession of the Assessee during search. The case arose from a search u/s 132 on CFM Group of Companies, wherein certain tally ledgers (“BCM/Porwal”) allegedly reflected commission payment of ₹5,50,000 to the Assessee. Relying solely on these seiz...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031