Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Relcon Infraprojects Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Relcon Infraprojects Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty not leviable on estimated bogus-purchase disallowance – Revenue appeals dismissed The Mumbai ITAT dismissed all seven appeals filed by the Revenue for AYs 2014-15 to 2020-21, upholding deletion of penalties levied under sections 271(1)(c) (for AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17) and 270A (for AYs 2017-18 to 2020-21). In the quantum proceedings arising from a search u/s 132, additions for alleged bogus purchases were ultimately restricted to 2% on an estimated basis, due to lack of evidence quantifying the extent of inflation. Relying on settled ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930