This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delay in Filing Appeals Condoned Despite Massive Additions and Penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ambarwadikar Infrastructure Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ambarwadikar Infrastructure Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Delay condoned despite huge additions & penalty: ITAT Pune restores both quantum and penalty appeals
Pune ITAT set aside the orders of the CIT(A), NFAC which had dismissed both the quantum appeal and the penalty appeal solely on the ground of delay, and restored both matters for adjudication on merits.
The Assessee-company had filed its original return declaring Nil income with a loss of ₹2.04 crore. In reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, the AO determined income at ₹26.45 crore, making major additions towards unsecured l...






