Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Delay in Filing Appeals Condoned Despite Massive Additions and Penalty

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ambarwadikar Infrastructure Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement
Ambarwadikar Infrastructure Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Delay condoned despite huge additions & penalty: ITAT Pune restores both quantum and penalty appeals Pune ITAT set aside the orders of the CIT(A), NFAC which had dismissed both the quantum appeal and the penalty appeal solely on the ground of delay, and restored both matters for adjudication on merits. The Assessee-company had filed its original return declaring Nil income with a loss of ₹2.04 crore. In reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, the AO determined income at ₹26.45 crore, making major additions towards unsecured l...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,494

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *