This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Capital Gain Proven with Full Documentation; Section 69A/69C Additions Deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Jasmine Jayantibhai Sanghavi (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs Jasmine Jayantibhai Sanghavi (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Penny-Stock Allegation Fails—Capital Gain Supported by Demat & Bank Evidence-AO Ignored Complete Documentation; 69A/69C Additions Deleted in Full
Tribunal considered Revenue’s appeal against deletion of additions of ₹1,98,723 u/s 69A & ₹1,987 u/s 69C relating to alleged accommodation entry in the scrip of Nobel Polymers Ltd. AO treated the LTCG as bogus on the basis of investigation wing input & held that Assessee introduced unaccounted money as sale proceeds.
CIT(A) deleted the addition after noting that Assessee had sub...
Author Info
