Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shrishail Dhulappa Honavad Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shrishail Dhulappa Honavad Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) No bills ≠ bogus: Bangalore ITAT deletes Sec 69A addition on agricultural income In this case, the assessee had declared agricultural income from cultivation carried out on about 39 acres of land, and the Assessing Officer accepted neither the full claim nor the explanation for a portion of receipts amounting to Rs. 7,00,761. The addition was made under section 69A merely because bills and vouchers were not available for certain local market sales and for an amount routed through the assessee’s son. The Tribunal noted that the ownership of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Mumbai: Depreciation on Trademark Allowed-AO Cannot Revisit Claim in Subsequent Years ITAT Mumbai: Delay in Filing Form 67 Not Fatal-Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied on Technical Grounds ITAT Mumbai: BSNL VRS Compensation is Capital Receipt-Exempt u/s 10(10B); Delay Condoned ITAT Mumbai: Reopening Invalid Without Proper Sanction-Entire Assessment Quashed 80P Relief Largely Allowed – Interest on Investments Held Eligible, Staff Loan Interest Taxable View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930