Case Law Details
Case Name : Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Rajkot
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
ITAT Rajkot held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit under section 69A of the Income Tax Act not sustained since assessee has adequate evidence supporting its claim of cash deposits. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Facts- The assessee is engaged in a retail business. AO held that an amount of Rs. 22,78,500/-, deposited in the bank by the assessee remains unexplained, therefore, assessing officer added the same amount to the total income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act.
C
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.