Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)

ITAT Rajkot held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit under section 69A of the Income Tax Act not sustained since assessee has adequate evidence supporting its claim of cash deposits. Accordingly, appeal allowed.

Facts- The assessee is engaged in a retail business. AO held that an amount of Rs. 22,78,500/-, deposited in the bank by the assessee remains unexplained, therefore, assessing officer added the same amount to the total income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act.

C

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930