This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition u/s. 69 not sustained as adequate evidence supporting cash deposits produced: ITAT Rajkot
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Rajkot
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
ITAT Rajkot held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit under section 69A of the Income Tax Act not sustained since assessee has adequate evidence supporting its claim of cash deposits. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Facts- The assessee is engaged in a retail business. AO held that an amount of Rs. 22,78,500/-, deposited in the bank by the assessee remains unexplained, therefore, assessing officer added the same amount to the total income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act.
CIT(A) confirmed the additi...






