Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition u/s. 69 not sustained as adequate evidence supporting cash deposits produced: ITAT Rajkot

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Hiren Dasani (Legal Heir) Tapulal Nathalal Dasani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Rajkot held that addition towards unexplained cash deposit under section 69A of the Income Tax Act not sustained since assessee has adequate evidence supporting its claim of cash deposits. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The assessee is engaged in a retail business. AO held that an amount of Rs. 22,78,500/-, deposited in the bank by the assessee remains unexplained, therefore, assessing officer added the same amount to the total income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act. CIT(A) confirmed the additi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *