This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Set Aside Penalty on Co-Noticees Due to Settlement by Main Noticee Under SVLDRS
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Salasar Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Salasar Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
The CESTAT Mumbai considered appeals involving penalties imposed on co-noticees under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, arising from proceedings against a main noticee. The main noticee had settled the entire dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR Scheme), and obtained a discharge certificate upon payment of the determined tax dues. Consequently, the appeal of the main noticee had already been disposed of by the Tribunal.
The co-noticees challe...
Author Info
