Sabka Vishwas - (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019
Service Tax : SC held that assessee cannot be denied relief under SVLDR Scheme for not making payment of dues in prescribed time limit due to in...
Excise Duty : M/s. UCN Cable Network (P) Ltd. Vs. Designated Committee under SVLDR Scheme, 2019 (Bombay High Court, Nagpur) Completion Of Invest...
Finance : Cases involving confiscation/ redemption fine are within the ambit of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLD...
Income Tax : THE INTRODUCTION TO THE SCENARIO The fostering of the economic growth and development have been assured and accounted in the hands...
Excise Duty : Memorandum seeking a special measure for the opening of Limited Time Window to process of Payment of Taxes under Sabka Vishwas - (...
Income Tax : The updated return facility encourages voluntary tax compliance, allowing taxpayers to correct income omissions. Proposal to exten...
Excise Duty : As we all are aware that, SVLDRS was introduced with the twin objectives- First, finalize the legacy disputes in Central Excise ...
Excise Duty : Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme The details of total amount of funds that are locked up in cases at various q...
Excise Duty : Keeping in view the response of the taxpayers to the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, the Central Government toda...
Excise Duty : Directorate General of Taxpayer Services, Mumbai Zonal Unit, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs organized a Symposium on ...
Service Tax : Gujarat High Court held SVLDRS relief unavailable as service tax was not quantified before 30 June 2019. Partial admission during ...
Service Tax : CESTAT held SVLDRS benefits lapsed as payment was made after the extended deadline. Service tax and interest were upheld, but pena...
Service Tax : The issue was rejection of a declaration under the dispute resolution scheme citing lack of quantification. The Court held that li...
Excise Duty : The Court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner’s application under the scheme. It noted that a co-noticee had alrea...
Service Tax : The Court held that payments cannot be denied credit merely because they were recorded under different accounting heads. It ruled ...
Excise Duty : CBIC-6/1 /2021 -CX-VI Section-CBEC Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Tax &am...
Excise Duty : In cases where assessee has filed ST-3 return on or before 30.6.2019 and has paid the tax dues in full before filing application, ...
Excise Duty : CBIC instruction on Manual processing of declarations filed by the co-noticees under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Sch...
Excise Duty : Manual processing of declaration filed under SVLDRS, 2019 in order to comply with the directions of the Hon'ble High Courts to the...
Excise Duty : Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (Removal of Difficulties) order 2020 dated 13th Nov.,2020- procedure for fi...
Gujarat High Court held SVLDRS relief unavailable as service tax was not quantified before 30 June 2019. Partial admission during inquiry was insufficient.
CESTAT held SVLDRS benefits lapsed as payment was made after the extended deadline. Service tax and interest were upheld, but penalty was deleted.
The issue was rejection of a declaration under the dispute resolution scheme citing lack of quantification. The Court held that liability was quantified before the cutoff date and directed acceptance of the declaration.
The Court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner’s application under the scheme. It noted that a co-noticee had already received relief under the same proceedings.
The Court held that payments cannot be denied credit merely because they were recorded under different accounting heads. It ruled that substantive relief under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme must prevail over technical classifications.
The Tribunal examined whether penalties can continue after the main dispute is settled. It held that co-noticees have no independent liability once the primary demand is resolved. The ruling clarifies the consequential nature of such penalties.
The issue was whether procedural delays and challan errors could deny SVLDR benefits. The Court held that substantive compliance prevails and relief cannot be denied for technical defects.
The High Court held that once a discharge certificate under the SVLDRS scheme is issued after payment of the determined amount, the tax demand for the covered period cannot be reopened.
The issue was denial of a discharge certificate despite timely payment under the Sabka Viswas Scheme. The Court ruled that authorities must issue the certificate once payment is admitted, even if the portal is defunct.
The Delhi High Court held that the SVLDR Scheme cannot be invoked for a show cause notice issued after 30 June 2019. Even if the notice arises from the same dispute, eligibility depends strictly on the statutory cut-off date.
