Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mitsuba Sical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mitsuba Sical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) The appeal before the CESTAT Chennai concerned the correct customs classification of imported goods described as “Arm and Blade Assembly for Windscreen Wipers.” The appellant had declared the goods under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 85129000 as parts of windscreen wipers. However, the Department reclassified them under CTH 85124000 as complete windscreen wipers, demanded differential duty, ordered confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, and imposed redemption fine and penalty. On appeal, the Commi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031