This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Arm & Blade Assembly Classifiable as Parts Due to Absence of Motor: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mitsuba Sical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mitsuba Sical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
The appeal before the CESTAT Chennai concerned the correct customs classification of imported goods described as “Arm and Blade Assembly for Windscreen Wipers.” The appellant had declared the goods under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 85129000 as parts of windscreen wipers. However, the Department reclassified them under CTH 85124000 as complete windscreen wipers, demanded differential duty, ordered confiscation under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, and imposed redemption fine and penalty. On ...
Author Info
