ITAT Mumbai held that amount cannot be treated as unexplained and accordingly addition u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as amount duly recorded in books of account and offered to tax as professional fees.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards unexplained expenditure u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act simply on the basis of scribbling note without any other oral/ documentary evidences is unwarranted and unsustainable.
ITAT Mumbai resorted back the matter to AO with direction to find out from the relevant PF authorities about the term every month as mentioned in Clause 38 of the Employees Provident Fund Scheme (EPF Scheme).
ITAT Mumbai held that the payment of compensation to CSA (Cricket South Africa) under the Termination Agreement is also not taxable under the provisions of the India-South Africa DTAA. Since the payment is not chargeable to tax in India in the hands of CSA, therefore, there is no obligation on the assessee to deduct tax at source under section 195 of the Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that provisions of Chapter X cannot be invoked for making a TP adjustment in case of Advertisement, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses.
ITAT Mumbai held that the Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education (MSBTE) would fall under the definition of state as per Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as entire addition is made on estimation basis and at no point of time it is proved that assessee has concealed the particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot extent exempt income earned by the assessee. Accordingly, AO is directed to restrict the disallowance u/s. 14A to the extent of exempt income.
ITAT Mumbai held that issuance of manual final assessment order without containing DIN (Document Identification Number) is deemed to have never been issued. Accordingly, the impugned order is unsustainable in law.
Explore the case of Dr. Shivajirao Jondhale Research Foundation vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai), where the tribunal remanded the issue of registration under section 80G back to the Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption for fresh consideration, citing principles of natural justice.
