Mumbai ITAT sets aside penalty under section 271B, citing previous penalty under section 271A for non-maintenance of accounts in Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija vs ITO case.
Discover Mumbai ITAT order on Capacite Infra Projects Ltd Vs DCIT, analyzing disallowance of non-genuine/Bogus purchases and its implications on tax assessment.
Mumbai ITAT ruled no penalty under section 271(1)(c) if bona fide mistakes in original return were corrected during assessment. Full text analysis included.
ITAT Mumbai held that compensation received by the assessee in out of court settlement for unilaterally terminating certain obligation under the agreement is an income assessed to business income and not an income assessed to capital gains as claimed by the assessee.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee was residing as well as carrying on her profession at Bangalore and thus, assumption of jurisdiction by the AO at Mumbai was invalid. Thus, an order which is passed without jurisdiction is non est in the eyes of law.
Discover ITAT Mumbais decision in S Sagar Enterprise vs DCIT, allowing refund of excess appeal fees and deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
Chirag Tejprakash Dangi successfully challenged the Income Tax Office’s (ITO) addition of Rs. 1.51 crore related to sale of alleged penny stocks. Learn why the assessee prevailed.
Read the detailed analysis of Manu Stock Broking Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT case by Mumbai ITAT. Learn how additional issues impacted proceedings under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
Mumbai ITAT orders AO to follow Sec 50C if stamp values exceed property FMV, in Rakhmabai Mhatre Mukkam Bhalgaon vs ITO case. Full text available.
Learn about the ITAT Mumbai ruling that prohibits filing appeals during a moratorium under section 14 IBC, as seen in the case of Kaushal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO.
