In Coronation Cigar Co. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), payments towards PF and ESI made before the due date of filing Income Tax Return are not disallowed under section 139(1) of the Act. Read the detailed analysis here.
JPR Investments vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai): Interest cost can’t be claimed as business expenditure for shares investment, directs recompute of STCG.
Read how ITAT Mumbai ruled in Jatin Enterprises vs ACIT case, quashing a penalty notice containing concealed and inaccurate income particulars.
ITAT Mumbai affirms 12.5% profit addition confirmed by NFAC in ITO Vs Rajesh Amulakhrai Sanghvi case for AY 2009-10. Detailed analysis of the order and its implications.
Discover the detailed analysis of the case National Stock Exchange of India vs. DCIT where ITAT Mumbai ruled that NSE’s contribution to Core SGF is not considered a contingency reserve.
AC Chokshi Share Brokers Pvt Ltd appeals against disallowed legal expenses for out-of-court settlement & defense. ITAT Mumbai orders readjudication. Details here.
ITAT Mumbai held that the expenses excluded from the export turnover have to be excluded from the total turnover as well while computing deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that as there is complete uniformity in not charging interest from AEs and Non-AEs for delay in realization of export proceeds, addition of notional interest in respect of transactions with AEs in the course of transfer pricing proceedings unwarranted.
ITAT Mumbai held that income by way of interest on loans given for residential purposes for period less than 5 years is eligible for deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that the payment made towards interconnect usage charges to foreign telecom operators does not accrue or arise in India and in the absence of any permanent establishment in India could not be brought to tax in India under Article 7 of DTAA.
