Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Introduction: Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija contested an ex parte order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding penalties imposed under sections 271A and 271B of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai deliberated on the matter. Detailed Analysis 1. Penalty Imposition: The assessee challenged penalties levied under sections 271A and 271B by the Assessing Officer (AO), which were subsequently upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)). The penalty under sec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031