Addition under section 68 for Long-term capital gains (LTCG) from sale of shares allotted pursuant to a demerger scheme as bogus and alleged that price manipulation based on a report from the Investigation Wing of the Income tax Department was not justified as the assessee proved genuineness by comprehensive documentary evidence.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance of claim of loss alleging participation in price rigging cannot be sustained since nothing is brought on record to demonstrate involvement of assessee in price rigging. Accordingly, claim of loss allowed.
Mumbai ITAT deletes income additions for Asha Bhadra in penny stock case, citing SEBI report and judicial precedents confirming genuine share transactions.
The ITAT Mumbai has ruled in the case of Dhiren Ramanlal Shah vs. ITO, allowing an individual partner to carry forward losses and get relief from late fees. The ruling hinges on the fact that the partner’s firm had to file an audit report, extending the partner’s own filing deadline.
Mumbai ITAT sets aside PCIT’s revisionary order against Johar Hasan Zojwalla, ruling that jurisdiction was wrongly assumed due to a factual error in the assessment year.
ITAT Mumbai rules on disallowances, unexplained cash, reassessment validity in J. Kumar Infraprojects tax case, partly upholding CIT(A)’s relief.
ITAT Mumbai has set aside a CIT(A) order for deciding an unrelated issue, and has restored the appeal for a fresh adjudication based on the original grounds.
The Mumbai ITAT has remanded a tax case, ruling that the AO was duty-bound to refer a valuation dispute to a DVO under Section 50C(2).
The ITAT Mumbai upholds deductions for Jyothy Labs, ruling that once allowed, they can’t be denied later. The court also addressed issues on interest allocation and capital gains.
The ITAT ordered a fresh hearing for Golden Liquor Agencies, stating that a technical glitch and a wrong email linked to an ex-employee were a reasonable cause.
