Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shashikant Damodar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shashikant Damodar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) AO duty-bound to refer valuation dispute to DVO u/s 50C(2)- Failure to seek DVO Report vitiates 50C addition- ITAT Remands Case to AO In Shashikant Damodar Patil v. ITO,  the Mumbai   ITAT set aside a long-term capital gains addition made u/s, holding that AO was duty-bound to refer the matter to  DVO when the assessee disputed the stamp duty valuation. Assessee had sold inherited land for ₹50 lakh pursuant to an agreement to sell originally executed by his father in 1981 and modified in 1983. Due to prolonged litigation, the conveyance deed ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930