Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jyothy Labs Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jyothy Labs Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Once allowed, can’t be denied later without withdrawing initial year relief – ITAT Mumbai on 80IB/80IC deduction Major issues & findings Deduction u/s 80IB/80IC Revenue disallowed deduction for Ujala Supreme on the ground that it is not “manufacturing.” ITAT followed its earlier orders & held that fabric whitener production constitutes manufacturing under Section 2(29BA). AO had allowed such deductions in initial years (starting AY 2009–10).  As per settled law [CIT vs. Paul Brothers (1995) 216 ITR 548 (Bom.),& Simple Food Produ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930