Case Law Details
Case Name : ITO Vs Ashwin Popatlal Shah (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Ashwin Popatlal Shah (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai: Rule 46A Violation Fatal – CIT(A) Cannot Delete Additions Without AO Verification
In this case, the ITAT Mumbai dealt with deletion of ₹2.01 crore alleged bogus purchase addition by the CIT(A), where the assessee had produced confirmations, invoices, and ITRs of suppliers during appellate proceedings.
The Tribunal found a serious procedural lapse—the CIT(A) had relied on additional evidence not furnished before the AO and failed to follow mandatory Rule 46A procedure, i.e., no remand report or opportunity was given to the Assessing O...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


