Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Ashwin Popatlal Shah (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Ashwin Popatlal Shah (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai: Rule 46A Violation Fatal – CIT(A) Cannot Delete Additions Without AO Verification In this case, the ITAT Mumbai dealt with deletion of ₹2.01 crore alleged bogus purchase addition by the CIT(A), where the assessee had produced confirmations, invoices, and ITRs of suppliers during appellate proceedings. The Tribunal found a serious procedural lapse—the CIT(A) had relied on additional evidence not furnished before the AO and failed to follow mandatory Rule 46A procedure, i.e., no remand report or opportunity was given to the Assessing O...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930