Madras High Court held that assessment after expiry of three years is barred by limitation as per section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Tax Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 (Entry Tax Act) even if return is not filed u/s 7.
Madras HC rules on GST for flavoured milk in Parle Agro case. Key verdict on classification; implications for businesses.
Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was allowable on receipt of interest from co-operative bank as a Co-operative Society was only a co-operative society as defined under the Act, be it a Co-operative Society carrying on banking business or Co-operative Society carrying on the other businesses or a Co-operative bank.
Explore the legal saga of a petitioner seeking de-sealing of property in Salem. Uncover the missteps in liquidation, tax checks, and the plea for justice.
Madras High Court permits a company to file a statutory appeal after the limitation period, citing difficulties in accessing the GST portal due to employee turnover.
Madras High Court’s ruling on cancellation of GST registration due to non-return filing. Learn about the case of Rakeshkumar vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT).
Madras High Court provided benefit of notification no. 03/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023 granting extension of time limit for application for revocation of cancellation of registration even if registration was cancelled on 11.05.2023. Accordingly, directed to restore GST registration.
Madras High Court case highlights importance of complying with Rule 88C of the CGST Rules to effect recovery based on difference in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. Madras High Court allowed the writ petition in M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner Chennai, ruling that no recovery could be effected without complying with rule 88C of the CGST Rules.
Customs department was directed to release fresh apples imported from New Zealand as the same were perishable in nature and were meant for human consumption, made the court find it appropriate to order the release of the goods, however, subject to the condition that Respondent should furnish a bank guarantee in order to safeguard the interests of the department.
Granting a short period of time to file a reply violates the legal right of an assessee. Learn about judgment of Madras High Court in case of M/s Health and Allied Insurance Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of State Tax, Chennai
