Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : SRM Engineering Construction Corporation Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.No.25013 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

SRM Engineering Construction Corporation Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) (Madras High Court)

In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has granted a reprieve to SRM Engineering Construction Corporation Limited, allowing them to file a statutory appeal for a GST-related issue despite the expiration of the limitation period. The court considered the company’s explanation that it could not access the GST portal promptly due to a decline in business and staff turnover. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the court’s decision and the circumstances that led to it.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Background of the Case:

The case revolves around an assessment order dated 23.02.2023, which was issued in response to a notice (GST DRC 01) sent to the petitioner on 19.12.2022. The assessment order was a result of discrepancies in GSTR1 and GSTR 3B returns, as well as differences in Input Tax Credit (ITC) between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A returns. Normally, the statutory period for filing an appeal would have expired on 22.05.2023, with an additional grace period until 22.06.2023.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031