This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Recovery Without Rule 88C Compliance for GSTR-1 vs. GSTR-3B Difference
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
Madras High Court recently ruled in the case of M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner Chennai [WP No. 28092 of 2023 dated September 25, 2023], highlighting the importance of complying with Rule 88C of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 when effecting recovery based on differences between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B.
Madras High Court allowed the writ petition and held that, no recovery can be effected directly based on the difference in Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR-3B wi...
Author Info
