Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that mere transfer of right to use any goods or even transfer of goods to be used in works or not shall not be a ‘sale’ unless it is supported by consideration.
Coromandel International Ltd Vs Union of India and others (Jammu and Kashmir High Court) It is submitted that petitioner, applied for reimbursement by way of Budgetary support for the period, January 2020 to March 2020 and April 2020 to June 2020 before Central Tax Authorities. The Adjudicating Authority illegally and arbitrarily rejected the reimbursement under […]
Godrej Consumer Products Limited Vs Union of India (Jammu & Kashmir High Court) In the present case, impugned Notifications are lucid and eloquent and need not be interpreted or construed in the way and manner the petitioner intends and chooses to and as a result whereof, writ petition qua impugned Notifications is liable to be […]
The Hon’ble J&K High Court held that, the Bank could auction the property even with encumbrances attached to property but it was incumbent upon the Bank to disclose the encumbrances and litigations on the same or tenancy, if any, attached to the property to all the persons who wanted to participate in the same and to the successful bidder
Syed Adeel Shah Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Jammu and Kashmir High Court) It appears that in an earlier round of litigation wherein the appellants had challenged the notice issued by the respondents under Section 8(4) of the PMLA Act, learned writ court had declined to grant indulgence in favour of the appellants and the writ […]
HC held that Registration once issued to assessee and later cancelled upon request can’t be revoked merely on the basis of disputes with brother of applicant, over undivided property.
Jammu Kashmir High Court held that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of exemption from payment of additional toll chargeable on capital goods imported by it for undertaking substantial expansion of its unit in the year 2006 as the benefit for the time was made available in the year 2008.
Jammu Kashmir High Court held that person aggrieved by the order of confirmation of provisional attachment made by the Adjudicating Authority is well within his/her right to file appeal u/s. 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 within this period of ten days and may persuade the Appellate Authority to intervene in the matter.
J&K HC while dismissing the writ petition observed that there was an alternative remedy provided under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act and the issue raised by the petitioner is a disputed question of fact that cannot adjudicated upon in the writ petition.
Held that the license under the Act or registration under the GST Act cannot be renewed/ granted due to the fact that the subject premise is under dispute between two persons
