Jammu & Kashmir HC held that that it was not open to the respondent-Enforcement Directorate to proceed against the petitioner in respect of offences under PMLA once the FIR in respect of the predicate offences had been stayed by the High Court.
J&K and Ladakh High Court rules leasehold interest in land as a company asset, impacting share valuation and capital gains calculation. Read the detailed judgment analysis.
Explore the legal nuances of delivery notes vs. delivery challans. While the petitioner equated them, the court clarified their distinct roles. A delivery note records shipments, while a delivery challan formalizes goods’ actual delivery, impacting inventory levels. Uncover the significance of these terms in legal contexts.
Malik Traders have secured a directive from the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court for the reconsideration of their ITC claim. The court’s emphasis on providing an opportunity for the petitioner to present evidence before the Appellate Authority reflects a commitment to fair adjudication in matters involving factual complexities.
Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that as the seizure of shawls containing prohibited material took place in Delhi, therefore, Delhi Court will be having jurisdiction in the matter and not the court of Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh.
J&K and Ladakh High Court rules no recovery of previously refunded cess amount by the Revenue Department, dismissing a delayed appeal of 1488 days.
Learn about the judgment of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court in the case of PCIT vs J&K Bank Ltd., where the court ruled that a bank is not obligated to deduct TDS from the interest paid to Jammu Development Authority on fixed deposits
Jammu Kashmir High Court held that the extended period of limitation as provided under provision to sub -section (1) of Section 11A was not invocable for the simple reason that the twin factors which are sine quo non for invoking the proviso were missing.
The J&K High Court ruled that trust registration under section 12AA cannot be denied solely for generating surplus profit. Read the full judgment here.
Court ruled that the funds in the Term Deposit Accounts were the income of the Government of India and exempt from TDS under Section 196 of the Act. Moreover, the JKSRRDA, being wholly financed by the Central Government, was also eligible for exemption under Notification No. 3489 dated 22.10.1970, despite not being registered under the Central Societies Registration Act.
