ITAT Jaipur’s decision on Sakku Devi’s penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act due to non-compliance with notices sent to an incorrect address.
This article discusses case of Gayatri Devi vs. PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) regarding Section 263, highlighting importance of genuine errors in assessments.
Explore significant ITAT Jaipur ruling in case of Kunan Mal Kalu Ram Jain vs. ITO, highlighting rejection of profit estimation without rejecting books of accounts.
ITAT Jaipur held that disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS unjustified merely on the allegation that certificate of accountant furnished is not in accordance with Rule 31ACB as such disallowance will lead to double taxation which is against the spirit of law.
In the case of Suresh Kumar Doodi vs. ACIT, ITAT Jaipur rules that delay in filing Form 67 doesn’t result in disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit under Rule 128(9).
Analyzing the recent ITAT Jaipur ruling on Safiq Ahmad Vs ITO. Assessee penalized for failing to cooperate in penalty proceedings under Sections 271B & 271(1)(c) of the Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that ignorance of law and bona fide belief cannot be termed as sufficient cause and hence condonation of delay in filing of an appeal not granted.
ITAT Jaipur held that assessee trust under the umbrella of Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer is genuinely performing its activities and objects of imparting education to the students coming off from poor or middle class families. Accordingly, denial to register the trust u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act unjustified.
Dive deep into case of DCIT Vs Suman Solanki, as ITAT Jaipur discusses its authority to rectify mistakes, amendments from Finance Act, 2021, and interpretation of Section 254(2).
ITAT Jaipur held that invocation of revisionary proceedings u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act justified in absence of proper inquiry by AO which renders the assessment order erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
