This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT deletes Section 271(1)(b) Penalty for Notices Sent to Incorrect Address
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sakku Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sakku Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
In the case of Sakku Devi vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO), an appeal was filed by the assessee challenging the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The primary issue in this case was the non-receipt of notices at the correct address by the illiterate rural lady assessee. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, focusing on the deletion of the penalty due to the incorrect address for notice delivery.
Detailed Analysis
The appellant, Sakku Devi, is an illiterate rural lady residing in Bhoyan, Tehsil-Chaksu, Jaipur, Rajast...





