ITAT Chennai dismisses the appeal of Fulcrum Venture India for AY 2018-19, granting liberty to reinstate if the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme application is not accepted.
ITAT Chennai remands a case to CIT(A) for reassessment, allowing the assessee a fresh opportunity to substantiate ₹51.20 lakh cash credit under Section 68.
ITAT Chennai directs entire bank credits to be treated as business receipts under Section 44AD for income estimation. Cash deposit addition adjusted.
ITAT Chennai deletes addition of Rs.53.23 Lakh on cash deposits during demonetization and directs re-computation of income in Balu Vignesh case.
Further, the change in the claim of deduction or status of the assessee would not mount to mistake apparent from records, and, as such, it cannot be rectified u/s. 154 of the Act.
ITAT Chennai held that notice u/s 274 r.w.s.270A of the Act was not a valid notice for the reason that the AO did not specify the satisfaction as to whether assessee had either ‘under reported the income or ‘misreported the income’.
As CIT(E) noticed some inconsistencies in the details submitted by the assessee, a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee why the application in Form 10AB should not be rejected.
ITAT Chennai held that only peak credit to be considered and no further addition to be made in case of circular transaction since bank account of appellant’s father duly considered for the purpose of calculating peak credit in the hands of assessee.
ITAT Chennai held that in view of pending decision before Madras High Court which has a bearing on the assessment, the assessment is restored back to the file of AO with a direction to await the pending decision.
When the person from whom the amount was borrowed has written off the amount in his accounts, the liability ceased to exist. As there was cessation of liability, the same cannot be part of sundry creditors of the assessee.
