Follow Us:

ITAT Chennai

Payment to US companies for ‘developing tooling’ and ‘validating new process for manufacture’ of wheels is taxable as fees for included services

April 19, 2011 1060 Views 0 comment Print

Recently, the Chennai bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Wheels India Ltd. v. ACIT I.T.A No. 1793/Mds/2006 (Chennai) held that payment made to US companies for ‘developing tooling’ and ‘validating new process for manufacture’ of wheels for commercial vehicle was ‘fees for included services’ as per Article 122 of the India-USA tax treaty.

Trust entitled to depreciation on assets, even if cost of such assets allowed as deduction u/s. 11

March 25, 2011 2791 Views 0 comment Print

Assessing Officer’s stand that ‘provision of computation of income under Section 11′ does not contain any provision which may entitle an assessee to claim weighted deduction for any expenses incurred’ is not acceptable as Section 11 provides that the income of the Trust is to be computed on commercial basis i.e. as per normal accounting principles. Normal Accounting Principles clearly provide for deducting depreciation to arrive at income. Income so arrived at (after deducting depreciation) is to be applied for charitable purpose.

Registration as ITP not necessary to appear before revenue

March 16, 2011 5850 Views 0 comment Print

As per clause (a) of Rule 49, an ‘authorized income-tax practitioner’ is any authorized representative as defined in clause (v) or clause (vi) or clause (vii) of sub-section (2) of section 288 for appearing before this Tribunal.

Payments to overseas telecommunication service providers towards provision of International Private Leased Circuit/ dedicated bandwidth to be taxable as Royalty

February 20, 2011 3001 Views 0 comment Print

The Chennai Tribunal has held that payments towards IPLC / dedicated bandwidth are towards use of ‘equipment’ or ‘process’ and therefore would qualify as royalty under the Act as well as DTAA. It may be noted that the proposition on ‘process’ eleme

Money advanced to shareholder for specific purpose cannot be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e)

February 6, 2011 2498 Views 0 comment Print

Deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e)-Money advanced to shareholder for specific purpose-Where the company advanced certain sum to a shareholder for a specific purpose then the amount so advanced cannot be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e)

Taxes withheld by determining the income of non-resident under special regime (section 44BB) without approaching the tax officer will not lead to violation of withholding tax provisions

February 4, 2011 954 Views 0 comment Print

Chennai Bench of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of Frontier Offshore Exploration (India) Ltd. v DCIT ITA No. 200/Mds/2009, held that where payment to a non-resident is covered under the special regime of section 44BB, withholding of appropriate tax by the payer through the application of the special regime and without approaching the Assessing Officer will not lead to any violation of withholding tax provisions. Accordingly, expenses cannot be disallowed for short withholding of taxes.

Taxes withheld by applying the provisions of section 44BB on payments to nonresident oilfield service provider not lead to breach of withholding tax provisions

February 4, 2011 2746 Views 0 comment Print

Frontier Offshore Exploration (India) Limited v. DCIT This decision strengthens the position that special provisions supersede the general provision of the Act for the purpose of withholding tax. It also acknowledges the view that the assessee may withhold tax by suo moto applying the special regime under the provisions of section 44BB.

No requirement to approach Tax Officer for nil withholding certificate u/s. 195(2) where non-resident is not liable to tax

November 9, 2010 877 Views 0 comment Print

No requirement to approach the Tax Officer for nil withholding certificate under section 195(2) where the non-resident is not liable to tax and further no disallowance can be made under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 In a recent decision, the Chennai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of VA Tech Wabag Ltd. v. ACIT [2010-TII-109-ITAT-MAD-INTL] held that in a case where the payment for services was not taxable in India under the provisions of a Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (“the tax treaty”), there was no requirement for applying to the tax officer for a nil withholding certificate under section 195(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). It was also held that as section 195 of the Act was not applicable, the amount paid for services could not be disallowed under section 40(a)(i) of the Act.

Deduction u/s.10B cannot be disallowed on ground of excess profits when the international transactions are held to be at arm’s length

November 7, 2010 717 Views 0 comment Print

Deduction u/s.10B cannot be disallowed on ground of excess profits when the international transactions are held to be at arm’s length. The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of M/s Tweezerman India Private Limited Vs ACIT [2010-TII-45-ITAT-MAD-TP] has held that deduction of eligible profits under Section 10B cannot be disallowed on ground of excess profits where the international transactions have been held to be at arm’s length by the Transfer Pricing Officer.

Export Turnover under section 10B and non excludability of Expenses incurred in foreign currency on onsite computer software development at the client

November 2, 2010 1865 Views 0 comment Print

(a)Expenses incurred in foreign currency on onsite computer software development at the client’s place outside India should be excluded from export turnover; and (b)Export proceeds utilized outside India for expenses relating to exports should be excluded from export turnover as a non-qualifying export turnover.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031