The ITAT Chennai ordered for the re-adjudication of capital gain assessment in the case of P. Selvamani Ranjithan vs ITO, emphasizing the responsibility of the assessee to prove non-accrual of capital gains.
Read the analysis of the case between K. S. Anbuselvan and ITO at ITAT Chennai. The court allows the appeals for re-adjudication of capital gains and deductions related to the sale of a property, following a reference to the District Valuation Officer (DVO) for valuation
The CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of Nitco Limited in a dispute over the delayed delivery of a SAD refund sanction order by the Commissioner of Customs. The case now returns to the first appellate authority for review.
Explore the recent case ruling by ITAT Chennai where the verdict was overturned due to a pending delay condonation application, highlighting the importance of due process in tax disputes.
A landmark decision by ITAT Chennai reinforces the validity of capital gain deductions under Section 54, even when flat possession is delayed. Explore the key aspects and implications of the Anil Kirthisimhan Wijeyanayake Vs ACIT case.
Baskaran, the Karta of the HUF, submitted that his prolonged illness prevented him from managing the day-to-day activities of the business, causing the delay in filing the appeal. Despite this, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, stating that the delay wasn’t sufficiently justified.
Learn about the recent order of the ITAT Chennai in the V. Babu vs ACIT case, where the CIT(A) appeal rejection due to delayed filing by the assessee is set for re-adjudication.
ITAT Chennai held that addition towards amount received as income sustained as it was specified that the amount was not given as loan or advances but was given for service towards arranging the whole deal.
ITAT Chennai held that addition towards unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as source for purchase of property duly established with necessary evidences.
ITAT Chennai held that the scope of assessment after search u/s.153A of the Income Tax Act would be limited to the incriminating material/evidence found during the course of search.
