The amount was never debited to the profit and loss account as an expenditure in the year they were received also the amount has not been written off. Said amount not taxable u/s 41(1)
Enhancing the quantity of gold by the weight of stones and diamonds is not logical. It was neither valued nor any Expert Valuers report was available on record. Addition unsustainable.
Books of accounts maintained by the assessee were audited and accepted by the AO. Cash sales and cash realized from debtors were also known to AO. Addition u/s 69A of cash deposited deleted.
Explore the ITAT Chandigarh ruling in Kapoor Singh Vs ITO case, analyzing delay condonation, agricultural assessees issues, and the merit of tax assessments.
HP Ex Servicemen Corporation Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Issue– Ld. CIT(A) not granted the credit of TDS of Rs. 1,90,76,546/- (duly reflected in Form no. 26AS) by stating that the assessee had not offered the freight receipts as income for the relevant year under consideration ignoring the fact that the assessee had shown the net […]
Government Corporation is like any other assessee before the tax authority and cannot be allowed to plead that on this count it be given a preferential treatment and be allowed to escape the responsibilities of representing their case before the other governmental authorities including the tax authorities.
DCIT Vs Ram Asra Goyal Education & Research Society (ITAT Chandigarh) Facts- The assessee society was registered under the Societies Registration Act and also registered u/s. 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee filed its ROI on 03-09-2014 declaring Nil income. Later on, the case was selected for scrutiny. During the course of assessment […]
We hold that in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search with respect to the impugned transaction, the AO did not have any power to make the impugned addition.
DCIT Vs Agya Ram Manohar Lal (ITAT Chandigarh) Facts- The brief facts of the case for AY 2016- 17 are that the assessee firm derives income from business and income from other sources. The assessee firm belongs to M/s Roop Square Group of companies where a search and seizure operation u/s 132(1) was conducted on […]
Valco Industries Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Facts- The assessee originally filed return declaring total income of Rs.4,83,83,620/- on 28.09.2012 after claiming deduction of Rs.5,75,64,789/- u/s 80IC of the Act. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 27.03.2015 at an income of Rs.8,07,03,620/- after making an addition of Rs.3,23,20,000/- on account of […]
