This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition for concealed profit not possible on mere surmises
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Agya Ram Manohar Lal (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Agya Ram Manohar Lal (ITAT Chandigarh)
Facts- The brief facts of the case for AY 2016- 17 are that the assessee firm derives income from business and income from other sources. The assessee firm belongs to M/s Roop Square Group of companies where a search and seizure operation u/s 132(1) was conducted on 01.11.2017 at various business and residential premises of the group. Subsequently, in response to notice issued u/s 153A of the Act, the return for AY 2016-17 was filed declaring an income of Rs. 7,67,200/-. Thereafter, the assessment was completed in terms of provisions of section 15...





