Asian Organo Industries Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (High Court Gujarat) The writ applicant claims that it is eligible for the IGST refund claim on the basis of the shipping bills i.e. on the export of goods. According to the writ applicant, the shipping bills filed by an exporter of the goods are deemed to […]
Gujarat HC directs DGFT to address petitioner’s plea on Import Export Code (IEC) denial. Full text of the judgment included.
No recovery in any mode by cheque, cash, e-payment or adjustment of input tax credit should be made at the time of search/inspection proceedings under Section 67 of the Central/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 under any circumstances.
This is one more matter amongst many other matters that have come up before us over a period of time wherein serious allegations of threats, pressure, coercion, etc. have been levelled against the respondents Nos.3, 4 and 5 respectively. It is pointed out by Dr. Poddar, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicants that the harassment was to such an extent that the writ applicant No.2 attempted to commit suicide
It is submitted that it is a case of total evasion of GST and disposing the manufactured goods without showing any record about its manufacturing activity and clandestine purchase of such products without paying of any GST has resulted in evasion to the tune of Rs. 9 Crores and odd
The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
That the officers conducting search proceedings also forced the management/directors of the company to make the payment of tax, interest and penalty at midnight. In fact the officers themselves have created the payment details in the system and the management was asked to make the payment.
This is one more matter wherein serious allegations of harassment, coercion, threats, etc. have been alleged against the respondents Nos.4 and 5 respectively herein. It appears that the search was undertaken under Section 67 of the Act at the premises of the writ applicant, and in the course of the search, the respondents Nos.4 and 5 are alleged to have caused undue harassment to the writ applicant. It is alleged that the writ applicant was forced and threatened to transfer an amount of Rs.2.68 Crore by way of the DRC – 03.
Netrika Trends Vs Deputy Commissioner Appeals (Gujarat High Court) HC disposes writ application with a direction to the respondents that once the writ applicant comes forward with a request for transfer of the Input Tax Credit in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 18 of the Act, the request shall be immediately look into […]
Assesssee alleged to have coerced and pressurized the writ applicant to transfer an amount of almost Rs. 9 Crore to the account of the department is shocking.
