Vivaa Tradecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The Gujarat High Court quashed the order and the demand notice passed by the respondent authority because of the procedural lapses and remitting the matter back to the respondent authority for fresh hearing. The first writ applicant, M/s Viva Tradecom Pvt. Ltd is a […]
Punjab National Bank Vs. Mithilanchal Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Gujarat High Court) In the present case, the borrower took an objection of non-compliance of sub-section (3), in his objection / representation given sub-section (3A), but despite the same the Bank – Secured Creditor in the present case rejected the objection instead of ensuring the compliance of […]
Pipush kumar O Desai Vs CIT (Gujarat High Court) Upon perusal of the relevant record, copies of which have been annexed to the paper book supplied to this court, it is very clear that the assessee had given sufficient details with regard to the sources from which he had purchased the jewellery in question. Upon […]
Namaskar Enterprise Vs Commissioner of Goods & Service Tax (Gujarat High Court) A perusal of the aforesaid Sub-Section-2 of Section 83 makes it abundantly clear that the provisional attachment would cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of the order made under Sub-Section-1. Although no specific […]
Sundeep Mahendrakumar Sanghavi Vs. Union of India (Gujarat High Court) (1) Any person can be arrested for any offence under the Customs Act, 1962, by the Customs Officer, if such officer has reasons to believe that such person has committed an offence punishable under Section 132 or Section 133 or Section 135 or Section 135A […]
Udaipur Cement Works Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a Public Limited Company, having its place of business at Rajasthan, has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ […]
Century Copper Rod Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commisssioner (Gujarat High Court) In this case Hon;ble HC was convinced that the amount has been withheld by the Assistant Commissioner for extra legal reasons. Once, the Tribunal had clearly held that the petitioner was entitled to refund of the amount, there was no reason for the assistant […]
High Court held that by prescribing the formula in Sub-rule 5 of Rule 89 of the CGGST Rules,2017 to exclude refund of tax paid on ‘input service’ as part of the refund of unutilised input tax credit is contrary to the provisions of Sub-section 3 of Section 54 of the CGST Act,2017 which provides for claim of refund of ‘any unutilised input tax credit’.
. Conjoint reading of Section 2(6) and 2(13), which defines export of service and intermediary service respectively, then the person who is intermediary cannot be considered as exporter of services because he is only a broker who arranges and facilitate the supply of goods or services or both.
State of Gujarat Vs Advanced Systek Private Limited (Gujarat High Court) It appears that when the assessee has sold the goods on the price, which is inclusive of tax, the turnover is to be calculated as per the formula provided in Section 8A of the CST. In the facts of the case the rate of CST applicable for the […]
