Chowdry Associates Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) From the entirety of the events, we find that in the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee had made purchases in the middle or last week of June 2013 through M/s Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd. and M/s Philips Commodities Pvt. Ltd. The NSEL failed to fulfill its commitments and ultimately […]
Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether expenditure on account of civil and interior works liable for depreciation at 10% or at 15%? ITAT states that, they have perused the items of the expenditure which has been reproduced by the assessing officer in the assessment order and […]
The issue under consideration is whether the assessment order passed by the assessing officer under section 153C is bad in law and void ab-initio?
whether disallowance of the expenses only on the basis that there was reduction in the sharing of the revenue in comparison to the earlier years is justified in law?
Whether upward adjustment to book profit under section 115JB of the Act, by treating the loss on purchase and redemption of mutual funds as expenditure relatable to earning exempt income is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO merely based on the statement recorded under section 132(4) of the I.T. Act is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether AOP is liable to tax at MMR if income of its members during relevant year exceeded basic exemption limit?
when a building and plant, machinery or furniture are inseparably let out, then under Income Tax it will be taxable under head of house Property, business or other sources?
The issue under consideration is whether the AO is correct in re-opening of the assessment under section 147 even though the assessee has disclose fully and truly all the material facts during original assessment?
Aince the AO has accepted the returned income for which reasons were recorded, therefore, for making any other addition, he should have issued fresh notice
