We have no hesitation in holding that Ld. AO was not within his jurisdiction to frame the reassessment in the name of non-existing entity and such reassessment order dated 10.03.2014 is nullity and not sustainable in the eye of law
M/s Nishit Fincap Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case The original assessment was completed u/s 143(3) on 03.12.2010 determining the total income at Rs.48,360/-. I find the assessment in this case was reopened on the basis of information obtained from the Investigation Wing, according to which, during the search and seizure operations […]
Purna Chandra Rout Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In case of the difference between the Assessee’s books of account and as per Form No. 26AS, then on the said difference, only embedded portion of the profits is to be taken into consideration and the addition is to be made thereon but entire turnover cannot be added […]
The assessee categorically denied receipt of rent over and above what is reflected in its books of accounts. Nothing has been brought on record to contradict the version of the assessee either by the learned AO or by the learned CIT(A). We, therefore, hold that rental income which has not been received by the assessee cannot be brought to tax.
ACIT Vs Late Sh. Amarjeet singh (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assessee is an individual and deriving income from property, share income as partner in M/s S.M. & Sons and M/s Santokh Singh & Sons and interest income. The assessee filed its return of income on 30.09.2011 declaring an income of Rs.19,27,700/-. Subsequently, the assessee revised […]
Shri Ram Sharnam Sabha Regd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Facts- The assesse is a society, engaged in religious and charitable activities. This society is running Ashrams and Medication programmes and was duly granted registration u/s 12AA. The assessee filed its ITR for AY 2016-17 declaring a taxable income of Rs. Nil. The AO noticed that […]
Delhi High Court in the case of DDIT (E) vs Petroleum Sports Promotion Board (Supra) it is clear that in case of a charitable society even if benefit u/s 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is denied and its income was brought to tax as income from other sources, all relevant expenditures were also to be allowed.
Ld. CIT(A) is required to apply her mind to all issues which arise from impugned order before her whether or not same had been raised by appellant before her; and further, that CIT(A) is obliged to dispose of the appeal on merits.
Ranjana Aggarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) When the original assessment is completed u/s 143(3) and the reassessment proceedings have been initiated after a period of 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year and there is no allegation of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all […]
ADM Agro Industries Latur & Vizag Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The grievance of the assessee is that impugned order passed by the A.O is illegal and barred by time. Section 154(7) of the Act prescribes the limitations for the passing order u/s 154 of the Act. For the sake of clarity, same is […]
