Analyzing the key implications of ITAT’s ruling in the case of ACIT Vs Jones Lang Lasalle Building Operation Pvt Ltd, highlighting the acceptability of business service charges for HR-related services provided by associate concerns.
Read about ITAT Delhi’s important ruling in the Hyderabad Distilleries and Wineries Pvt Ltd case, confirming that income from lease rent and packaging charges in manufacturing services is treated as business income.
The recent ITAT Delhi decision in the case of Karamveer Singh Vs ITO emphasises the non-taxability of immovable property bought through funds gifted by relatives. Explore the case’s specifics, implications, and outcomes here.
Explore the details and implications of the Vikash Daga vs ACIT case, where ITAT Delhi upheld the right to claim foreign tax credit under Section 90, despite procedural anomalies. Understand the balance between procedural norms and substantive rights in the context of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT upheld the right of an individual to use personal savings, including those from a late spouse, for the repayment of a bank loan, and dismissed the claim that such actions constitute unexplained investment.
Detailed review of ITAT Delhi’s ruling in favor of the assessee, Tarik Tondon, where the reassessment order was cancelled due to lack of verification of the information which initiated the reopening.
The recent ITAT Delhi ruling in the Shantiniketan Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT case allows high-interest payments under commercial expedience, refuting disallowance under Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi overturns an ex-parte assessment passed under Section 144, citing insufficient opportunity for the assessee. The case is returned to the AO for a re-examination in compliance with the law.
In a significant ruling, ITAT Delhi sets aside the exparte order against Maha Singh, allowing a fresh evaluation of unexplained cash deposits following due principles of natural justice.
ITAT Delhi held that more specific plea and explanation ought to be given by an assessee for discharging burden u/s 69B of the Income Tax Act to explain jewelry beyond that mentioned in Wealth Tax Return.
