ITAT Delhi held that business promotion expenditure incurred for improving the visibility of the brand and sale of the products is routine expenses incurred during the course of the business. Accordingly, the same is allowable expenditure.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessee (M/s. Cane Development Council Titawi) being a local authority are not chargeable to tax in terms of section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessment order passed against a non-existing company is void ab initio and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that addition sustained as onus to prove genuineness of the transaction is not proved by the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that to burden assessee with capital gain arising out of transfer of immovable property or an interest in it, the cost of acquisition is necessarily to be established. Here, cost of acquisition of so called right of preemption is considered as NIL. Hence, computation provisions fail, therefore capital gains could not have been calculated.
ITAT Delhi held that the revenue authorities are not entitled to appropriate the taxes which have been paid in excess of the due taxes to be paid by the assessee. Accordingly, reducing refund by withdrawing benefit of TDS on advance rent received is unjustified.
ITAT held that in the absence of an ascertainable amount and identifiable payee, the machinery provisions of recovering tax deducted at source falls flat
ITAT Delhi held that hollow and cosmetic approval accorded under section 153D of the Income Tax Act without application of mind is unenforceable in law and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment proceedings merely on the basis of information received from the investigation wing is invalid and bad in law and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that assessee would be entitled for deduction on account of bad debts written off as part of the sales amount is not received.
